The key standardized beta coefficient (? = –0

The key standardized beta coefficient (? = –0

The Engagement Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Engagement subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .08). 245) for the rationalist epistemology, t(1096) = – 8.42, p < .001, was in the opposite direction compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.119) for the constructivist epistemology, t(1096) = 4.08, p < .001, along the Engagement subscale.

The Attentional Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Attentional subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .18). The significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.396) for the rationalist epistemology t(1096) = , p < .001, was in the positive direction; whereas the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.129) for the constructivist epistemology t(1096) = –4.12, p < .001, which was in the negative direction along the Attentional subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology has more of a leaning towards a narrow focus on the Attentional subscale, and the constructivist epistemology leans more towards a broad focus on the Attentional subscale.

The Operative Subscale Lastly, epistemology was a significant predictor of the therapy style along the Operative subscale, F(2, 1093) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .256). The standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.461) for the rationalist epistemology was significant, t(1093) = , p < .0001 and in the positive direction, compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.170), for the constructivist epistemology, t(1093) = –6.50, p < .0001, which was in the negative direction along the Operative subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology tends towards more planning on the Operative subscale and the constructivist epistemology tends towards more spontaneity on the Operative subscale.

That it supported brand new theory your rationalist epistemology seems toward a beneficial reduced standard of wedding toward Wedding subscale additionally the constructivist epistemology seems on an elevated standard of engagement to the Wedding subscale

For this reason, epistemology (rationalist against. constructivist) is found to be a life threatening predictor out of treatment style. Particularly, the most sturdy conclusions provide provisional service into belief you to definitely there are specific variations in the non-public variety of the specialist depending on the therapists’ epistemic presumptions. So much more specifically, the current analysis learned that practitioners having rationalist epistemologies tended into the a lot more length, a lowered standard of wedding, a beneficial narrower notice, and you may a heightened level of believe within sessions that have website subscribers, while, the latest constructivist epistemology tended into the with a heightened amount of intimacy, a greater degree of engagement, a wide interest, and more sense of humor within procedures courses. Concurrently, you will find particular assistance on notion one therapists having constructivist epistemologies tend towards the new advice out of flexibility in lieu of tightness inside its therapy style; although not this is maybe not a really solid selecting in the current data.

This type of results are of help with regards to the latest probably built-in distinctions maintained by rationalist instead of constructivist epistemologies centered on treatment build. Even more particularly, current conclusions hold the notion you to definitely intellectual-behavioural therapies, and this portray a knowledgeable portrayal of one’s rationalist epistemology, maintain an enthusiastic “active-directive” and you may medical method of Dating-Seiten für erotische Menschen cures (Granvold, 1988) which have specific desires used to package the category of course (Mahoney Lyddon, 1988).

Theory 2-Epistemology Has an effect on the new Therapeutic Relationships

With regards to the 2nd hypothesis-practitioners having rationalist epistemologies commonly score highest on Task and you will Purpose subscales and lower towards Thread subscale than the constructivist epistemologies-another several linear regression design are held to decide when your exact same predictor adjustable (therapist epistemology) create influence therapists’ reviews of expectations parameters (doing work alliance) predicated on therapists’ many around three subscales-Activity, Mission, and you will Bond.

Laisser un commentaire