The key standardized beta coefficient (? = –0
The Engagement Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Engagement subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .08). 245) for the rationalist epistemology, t(1096) = – 8.42, p < .001, was in the opposite direction compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.119) for the constructivist epistemology, t(1096) = 4.08, p < .001, along the Engagement subscale.
The Attentional Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Attentional subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .18). The significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.396) for the rationalist epistemology t(1096) = , p < .001, was in the positive direction; whereas the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.129) for the constructivist epistemology t(1096) = –4.12, p < .001, which was in the negative direction along the Attentional subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology has more of a leaning towards a narrow focus on the Attentional subscale, and the constructivist epistemology leans more towards a broad focus on the Attentional subscale.
The Operative Subscale Lastly, epistemology was a significant predictor of the therapy style along the Operative subscale, F(2, 1093) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .256). The standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.461) for the rationalist epistemology was significant, t(1093) = , p < .0001 and in the positive direction, compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.170), for the constructivist epistemology, t(1093) = –6.50, p < .0001, which was in the negative direction along the Operative subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology tends towards more planning on the Operative subscale and the constructivist epistemology tends towards more spontaneity on the Operative subscale.
That it supported brand new theory your rationalist epistemology seems toward a beneficial reduced standard of wedding toward Wedding subscale additionally the constructivist epistemology seems on an elevated standard of engagement to the Wedding subscale
For this reason, epistemology (rationalist against. constructivist) is found to be a life threatening predictor out of treatment style. Particularly, the most sturdy conclusions provide provisional service into belief you to definitely there are specific variations in the non-public variety of the specialist depending on the therapists’ epistemic presumptions. So much more specifically, the current analysis learned that practitioners having rationalist epistemologies tended into the a lot more length, a lowered standard of wedding, a beneficial narrower notice, and you may a heightened level of believe within sessions that have website subscribers, while, the latest constructivist epistemology tended into the with a heightened amount of intimacy, a greater degree of engagement, a wide interest, and more sense of humor within procedures courses. (suite…)